[ZendTo] Re: Probably a stupid questionŠ .
John Thurston
john.thurston at alaska.gov
Mon Jul 15 17:08:33 BST 2013
On 7/13/2013 8:21 AM, Gray McCord wrote:
> Thanks, John! I'll give this a try. BTW, when you talk about less
> throughput, can you tell about how much?
I did not perform benchmarks in either configuration. But based on my
personal observations it is no more than half the throughput. Note, this
isn't responsiveness or latency I'm discussing, this is time required to
transfer a large file.
If this were a mission-critical application, I don't think I'd deploy it
this way. Since this is a kinda-best-effort application for us, the
throughput isn't the deciding factor. I hope, someday, to move the
application behind a NetScaler and retire my apache proxy.
YMMV. In my deployment, I'm proxying https via https, so there is a lot
of protocol overhead. I am not using "jumbo" frames. I have made no
effort to optimize my https cipher negotiations or implement ssl
off-loading. My ZendTo is running on linux on VMWare ESXi. I don't know
if VMWare or its networking is is optimally configured.
--
Do things because you should, not just because you can.
John Thurston 907-465-8591
John.Thurston at alaska.gov
Enterprise Technology Services
Department of Administration
State of Alaska
More information about the ZendTo
mailing list