[ZendTo] Re: Probably a stupid questionŠ .

John Thurston john.thurston at alaska.gov
Mon Jul 15 17:08:33 BST 2013


On 7/13/2013 8:21 AM, Gray McCord wrote:
> Thanks, John!  I'll give this a try. BTW, when you talk about less
> throughput, can you tell about how much?

I did not perform benchmarks in either configuration. But based on my 
personal observations it is no more than half the throughput. Note, this 
isn't responsiveness or latency I'm discussing, this is time required to 
transfer a large file.

If this were a mission-critical application, I don't think I'd deploy it 
this way. Since this is a kinda-best-effort application for us, the 
throughput isn't the deciding factor. I hope, someday, to move the 
application behind a NetScaler and retire my apache proxy.

YMMV. In my deployment, I'm proxying https via https, so there is a lot 
of protocol overhead. I am not using "jumbo" frames. I have made no 
effort to optimize my https cipher negotiations or implement ssl 
off-loading. My ZendTo is running on linux on VMWare ESXi. I don't know 
if VMWare or its networking is is optimally configured.
-- 
    Do things because you should, not just because you can.

John Thurston    907-465-8591
John.Thurston at alaska.gov
Enterprise Technology Services
Department of Administration
State of Alaska


More information about the ZendTo mailing list